Pages 32 – 38
Toward Real-Time Organism-Level Monitoring of Photobiomodulation Response
Authors
Dr. Lynette Wallace1*
Affiliations
1
Planetsmiles Pty Ltd
Abstract
Photobiomodulation (PBM) is increasingly discussed across dentistry, orofacial pain, rehabilitation, wound care, and other translational clinical settings. Current PBM literature appropriately emphasizes optical parameters, tissue optics, mitochondrial and redox signaling, in
flammatory modulation, and local clinical outcomes [1-3]. These foundations remain essential. A complementary question remains less developed: what occurs at the level of the patient during PBM care?
Two patients may receive similar wavelengths, irradiance, fluence, anatomical targeting, and exposure duration. They may still differ in breathing rhythm, muscular guarding, cardiovascular variability, movement, and behavioral regulation during the same clinical encounter.
This Perspective proposes that PBM research may benefit from a real-time physiological observation layer at the patient level. The article presents a restrained framework for observing short term heart rate variability (HRV), respiratory rhythm, respiratory heart rate variability patterns, waveform quality, movement, posture, and behavioral context before, during, and after PBM exposure.
The discussion emphasizes biphasic dose-response behavior, hormesis, nonlinear adaptation, and interindividual physiological variability. HRV is not presented as an exposure-selection tool, diagnostic method, treatment endpoint, or proof of effectiveness. Instead, patient-level monitor
ing is framed as a complementary observational layer that may help contextualize tissue-level outcomes and patient-reported responses.
Respiratory confounding, LF/HF limitations, placebo and context effects, wearable-device constraints, and the need for ethics-approved prospective studies remain central. If investigated carefully, this framework may help PBM research describe dynamic treatment-response patterns within a broader systems-physiology context.
Keywords:
photobiomodulation; heart rate variability; respiratory heart rate variability; dentistry; biphasic dose response; hormesis; physiological monitoring; systems physiology; pain; clinical translation.
Access Full Text
Open Access
Free to read
Full article, original layout
📚 References
1. Dompe C, Moncrieff L, Matys J, Grzech-Leśniak K, Kocherova I, Bryja A, Bruska M, Dominiak M, Mozdziak P, Skiba T, Shibli J, Volponi AA, Kempisty B, Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska M. Photobiomodulation—underlying mechanism and clinical applications. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020;9:1724. doi:10.3390/jcm9061724
2. Hamblin MR. Mechanisms and applications of the anti-inflammatory effects of photobiomodulation. AIMS Biophysics. 2017;4:337-361.
3. de Freitas LF, Hamblin MR. Proposed mechanisms of photobiomodulation or low-level light therapy. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics. 2016;22:7000417.
4. Eltahir L, Elgendy M, Ali G, Elamin A, Omer S, Khazam N. Photobiomodulation in dentistry: mechanisms, clinical applications and evidence-based guidelines. Bioinformation. 2025;21:4203-4206. doi:10.6026/973206300214203
5. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Heart rate variability: Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Circulation. 1996;93:1043-1065.
6. Shaffer F, Ginsberg JP. An overview of heart rate variability metrics and norms. Frontiers in Public Health. 2017;5:258. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258
7. Hayano J, Yuda E. Pitfalls of assessment of autonomic function by heart rate variability. Journal of Physiological Anthropology. 2019;38:3. doi:10.1186/s40101-019-0193-2
8. Anders JJ, Lanzafame RJ, Arany PR. Low-level light/laser therapy versus photobiomodulation therapy. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery. 2015;33:183-184. doi:10.1089/pho.2015.9848
9. Huang YY, Chen ACH, Carroll JD, Hamblin MR. Biphasic dose response in low-level light therapy. Dose-Response. 2009;7:358-383.
10. Huang YY, Sharma SK, Carroll J, Hamblin MR. Biphasic dose response in low-level light therapy—an update. Dose-Response. 2011;9:602-618. doi:10.2203/dose-response.11-009.Hamblin
11. Menuet C, Ben-Tal A, Linossier A, Allen AM, Machado BH, Moraes DJA, Farmer DGS, Paterson DJ, Mendelowitz D, Lakatta EG, Taylor EW, Ackland GL, Zucker IH, Fisher JP, Schwaber JS, Shanks J, Paton JFR, Buron J, Spyer KM, Shivkumar K, Dutschmann M, Joyner MJ, Herring N, Grossman P, McAllen RM, Ramchandra R, Yao ST, Ritz T, Gourine AV. Redefining respiratory sinus arrhythmia as respiratory heart rate variability: an international Expert Recommendation for terminological clarity. Nature Reviews Cardiology. 2025;22:978-984. doi:10.1038/s41569-025-01160-z
12. Skytioti M, Elstad M. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia is mainly driven by central feedforward mechanisms in healthy humans. Frontiers in Physiology. 2022;13:768465. doi:10.3389/fphys.2022.768465
13. Billman GE. The LF/HF ratio does not accurately measure cardiac sympatho-vagal balance. Frontiers in Physiology. 2013;4:26. doi:10.3389/fphys.2013.00026
14. Forte G, Troisi G, Pazzaglia M, De Pascalis V, Casagrande M. Heart rate variability and pain: a systematic review. Brain Sciences. 2022;12:153. doi:10.3390/brainsci12020153
15. Fernandez Rojas R, Brown N, Waddington G, Goecke R. A systematic review of neurophysiological sensing for the assessment of acute pain. npj Digital Medicine. 2023;6:76. doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00810-1
16. Li K, Cardoso C, Moctezuma-Ramirez A, Elgalad A, Perin E. Heart rate variability measurement through a smart wearable device: another breakthrough for personal health monitoring? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023;20:7146. doi:10.3390/ijerph20247146